Exporting video is too long.

RyanPark

For example, ShanaEncoder can export video much faster because it uses multi-thread.

It is 3-5 times faster than VideoPad.

I don't know when you will support that feature, but if you do, many people will love that.

Miggy

While searching for a particular issue, I ran across a thread on here from several years ago that said the developers wanted to concentrate on "average computers" and that more advanced systems wouldn't be of any benefit. I don't know if that philosophy has changed or not.

c_major_2

We are constantly working on improving performance.

Exporting speed can affect by many factors e.g. number of tracks, number of effects and export settings etc..

Rhea

So I have extremely simple project with just chopped up clips, single track. Exporting uses only two cores. As a programmer I don't understand why because you can very easily alternate frame numbers on different cores, etc... Here is an idea:
* Use (numCores - audioTracks) cores to deal with video.
* Use (audioTracks) cores to deal with audio (one core per track)

Average computer today has at least 4 cores, not two, and an average computer of a content creator has at least 8 cores, if not 12, not two. Please allow full multithreading on export so that our new AMD chips are not bored =)

Here is an idea - open source it and I'll implement it 😇

borate

The last comment in this thread was posted by a developer four years ago...

http://nch.invisionzone.com/topic/21984-videopad-only-using-5-10-of-cpu-power/?tab=comments#comment-50543