Any of the lossless codecs will give mathematically perfect representations of the sound being recorded.
However lossy codecs are so close to perfect that it isn't significant.
1 --------------------
Maybe to _your_ ears, but not to mine. This is an absurd statement, and I am very surprised to see it posted in this forum! If a "lossy" codec is so close to perfect that the loss is insignificant, then why on earth are there so many different bitrates available for mp3 (a lossy codec) encoding? According to your statement, the difference between an mp3 sound file encoded at an 8k bitrate and an mp3 sound file encoded at a 320k bitrate "isn't significant". I (and everyone else who knows anything at all about the subject of codecs) beg to disagree.
1 --------------------
For the record the best sounding sound card I have ever heard is an original ISA SB16. Awesome amplifiers on those cards.
2 --------------------
What does this have to do with the subject of this particular discussion thread (the flac codec)?
2 --------------------
The moral to the story is that Wavepad can use many codecs. Feel free to use almost any for essentially flawless sound reproduction.
3 --------------------
"Essentially flawless sound"? Surely you must be kidding!
3 --------------------
As for fixing flac, Wave Pad can play any format it can load. If not it should automatically download the codec to allow it to do so. Cancelling that download can cause trouble.
4 --------------------
Help!! We're all trapped in the Twilight Zone.
Musikone
(I'm sure glad that I don't have any questions about WavePad that I would like answered here. Perhaps NCH will provide us all with a special WavePad Discussion Forum Filter :-))
4 --------------------